Blog2017-03-08T08:24:22+01:00

Blog

Why the value of on-site monitoring cannot be challenged by remote/ centralized monitoring

This is not to say we should do as we always did. This is also not to promote unnecessarily frequent monitoring visits or a 100% source data verification (SDV). However, in times were risk-based quality management including centralized monitoring are in the regulatory focus, I feel we forget to reflect the undeniable value that on-site monitoring can give to a clinical study [...]

A hitchhiker’s guide to data review in an ongoing (“live”) study – part 1: data review for pharmacovigilance purposes

In a way, data review for pharmacovigilance purposes is the simplest and yet most demanding kind of data review, as time is a pressing matter in this context. The data are reviewed in different time frames according to the potential risks that arise from them [...]

By |November 8th, 2017|Categories: Data, eCRF & Technical, Safety|Tags: , , , , |

What to consider when planning the sample size for a non-interventional study

The determination of an "adequate" sample size is an essential part of the statistical planning process. Depending on your type of non-interventional study design and your specific study objectives, there are different approaches for the planning of your sample size [...]

By |September 20th, 2017|Categories: Biostatistics, Study Design|Tags: , , , |

Acting out? Points to consider when planning to involve actigraphy measurements into your study design

From a medical perspective, addressing concepts of physical activity and activity capacity, vital signs (like heart rate or blood pressure), and/or sleep quality in a real-time manner rather than a snap-shot at a visit, make perfect sense and could enrich the value story of novel therapies. However, when planning to involve actigraphy measurements into your study design, there are several points to be considered, including issues of validity, data transfer and data analysis [...]

Go to Top